Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 7th May 2014 10:43 UTC

One single paragraph from one of the many court documents (via!) in the ongoing legal battle between Apple and Samsung. One single paragraph that not only perfectly highlights the hypocrisy of technology companies, but also the complete and utter disjoint between a technology company's legal, marketing, and engineering departments.

Contrary to the image it has cultivated in the popular press, Apple has admitted in internal documents that its strength is not in developing new technologies first, but in successfully commercializing them. When Apple was developing its campaign to promote the first iPhone, it considered - and rejected - advertisements that touted alleged Apple "firsts" with the iPhone. As one Apple employee explained to an overly exuberant Apple marketer, "I don't know how many things we can come up with that you can legitimately claim we did first. Certainly we have the first successful versions of many features, but that's different than launching something to market first." In this vein, the employee methodically explained that Palm, Nokia and others had first invented the iPhone's most prominent features.

The marketing department has no clue about the technology it needs to advertise. The legal department cleverly writes its patent application despite knowing full well that the technology it tries to patent is not new. Meanwhile, the engineer - the actual person implementing the technology - knows exactly what is going on, but is gagged from openly speaking his or her mind. The only thing I'm not sure about is which of these three is the biggest hypocrite.

Intellectual property - and patents in particular - has ruined the technology industry with lies, deceit, and hypocrisy. We just stood by and let it happen.

Permalink for comment 588326
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[9]: Comment by henderson101
by WorknMan on Thu 8th May 2014 00:17 UTC in reply to "RE[8]: Comment by henderson101"
Member since:

So sticking your fingers in your ears and singing loudly makes the problem go away?

For me? Yes, because I'm not the one getting sued, and I doubt you are either. Hence, it doesn't concern me. I don't give two shits about how many millions these rich commercial bastards have to pay each other in patent lawsuits. They can sue each other until they're blue in the face for all I care. I don't see any of them lobbying hard in Washington to end software patents, so they get zero sympathy from me when they get their asses handed to them in court.

The ONLY time I want to know about these things is when some product gets banned or some company/individual is put out of business. But since such things rarely happen, it's not enough fodder for tech bloggers to post their daily rants. In a way, their constant posting on the subject probably is doing more harm than good, by causing most of us to tune out early. Same with net neutrality.

Reply Parent Score: 1