Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 22nd May 2014 18:21 UTC, submitted by Shane
General Development

I was at the OpenStack Summit this week. The overwhelming majority of OpenStack deployments are Linux-based, yet the most popular laptop vendor (by a long way) at the conference was Apple. People are writing code with the intention of deploying it on Linux, but they're doing so under an entirely different OS.

But what's really interesting is the tools they're using to do so. When I looked over people's shoulders, I saw terminals and a web browser. They're not using Macs because their development tools require them, they're using Macs because of what else they get - an aesthetically pleasing OS, iTunes and what's easily the best trackpad hardware/driver combination on the market. These are people who work on the same laptop that they use at home. They'll use it when they're commuting, either for playing videos or for getting a head start so they can leave early. They use an Apple because they don't want to use different hardware for work and pleasure.

Apple's laptops are still the best PCs money can buy at the moment (despite their horribly outdated displays). It's no wonder Linux developers, too, favour them.

Permalink for comment 589385
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
no dogfood
by nicubunu on Fri 23rd May 2014 06:48 UTC
Member since:

Beyond the hardware aspect, this article give a good pointer about why so many things go the wrong way in the Linux/FOSS world these days: a lot of (paid) developers who don't like and don't understand Linux, they prefer to use something different. Thus, they try to morph Linux into something to their liking, so we end with GNOME 3, Systemd and so on. Their are f*cking our Linux desktop experience.

Reply Score: 6