Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 20th May 2014 17:48 UTC

Microsoft has unveiled a new Surface Pro 3 device at a press event in New York City today. Like the previous Surface tablets it still includes a kickstand, but Surface chief Panos Panay says it's designed to remove the conflict of buying a laptop or a tablet. The kickstand on the device is multi-stage, and the device is just 9.1mm thick. "This is the tablet than can replace your laptop," claims Panay. Microsoft has moved to a 12-inch screen on the Surface Pro 3 with a 3:2 aspect ratio and HD display, but the new tablet also has thin bezels with a silver and black design. Microsoft will start accepting pre-orders on the Surface Pro 3 tomorrow starting at $799.

It's an amazing piece of hardware, and Microsoft really deserves praise for the amount of power it has managed to pack in such a slim and light package, but the same could be said of the previous Surface Pro - and that one hasn't exactly taken the market by storm either. The problem, is software - something Microsoft was remarkably hush-hush about during the unveiling.

Something else Microsoft was hush-hush about: Windows RT and ARM. No new RT/ARM-based Surface device, and I have a feeling that particular experiment has met its end today.

Permalink for comment 589394
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: amazing?
by unclefester on Fri 23rd May 2014 08:51 UTC in reply to "RE[3]: amazing?"
Member since:

Define "general use" though. Video/Photo editing is a common "general use" these days.

You'd be far better off buying a low cost dedicated desktop or 15.6" laptop and a chromebook or tablet.

I, personally, would buy the best machine possible at the time of purchase. I replace my laptops rarely, and getting the best possible spec means the cost of ownership against time of usefulness is greatly improved.

This is a very poor investment strategy. It nearly always gives you the worst possible cost/performance ratio. Today's flagship model laptop/desktop/monitor/phone/camera is typically a very low range model in three years and an almost worthless brick in six years.

As a consumer the greatest 'bang for your buck' is achieved by upgrading mid range technology on a 12-24 month cycle.

Reply Parent Score: 3