Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 1st Jun 2014 21:33 UTC
Talk, Rumors, X Versus Y

There were two striking pieces of business news this week from America's leading technology brands. On the one hand, Google unveiled a prototype of an autonomous car that, if it can be made to work at scale, promises to end mass automobile ownership while drastically reducing car wreck fatalities and auto-related pollution. Meanwhile, Apple bought a company that makes high-end headphones.

Which is to say that Apple's playing checkers while Google plays chess.

For better or worse, this is exactly why many people seem to hold Google in higher regard than they do Apple. Both Apple and Google are rich and wealthy beyond average-person-measure. Now, which company will be liked more: the one that uses said wealth to develop crazy may-or-may -not-work technologies that can change the world at a massively substantial scale, or the one that stuffs $150 billion in shady bank accounts to avoid having to pay taxes?

The more wealth you hoard, the less sympathetic people will be towards you. Unless, of course, you use that wealth in a very public way.

Permalink for comment 589893
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: When it comes to taxes...
by leech on Sun 1st Jun 2014 22:00 UTC in reply to "When it comes to taxes..."
Member since:

Ha, I was thinking the same thing.

Honestly, I think the main difference at this point between Google and Apple is that Apple is ran more by hipsters and Google is ran more by nerds.

The hipsters are of the mindset that if it's design is cool, than that's better.

Nerds care more about functions and gadgets. This is why Google is the one who is experimenting with all the self-driving cars, and google glass stuff. Apple takes years of previous work, polishes it up a bit and releases. Which is why all of their new releases are evolutionary instead of revolutionary.

Reply Parent Score: 3