Linked by jessesmith on Wed 5th Nov 2014 10:39 UTC
Linux Over the past year I've been reading a lot of opinions on the new init technology, systemd. Some people think systemd is wonderful, the bee's knees. Others claim that systemd is broken by design. Some see systemd as a unifying force, a way to unite the majority of the Linux distributions. Others see systemd as a growing blob that is slowly becoming an overly large portion of the operating system. One thing that has surprised me a little is just how much people care about systemd, whether their opinion of the technology is good or bad. People in favour faithfully (and sometimes falsely) make wonderful claims about what systemd is and what it can supposedly do. Opponents claim systemd will divide the Linux community and drive many technical users to other operating systems. There is a lot of hype and surprisingly few people presenting facts.
Permalink for comment 599032
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: A cople of comments.
by CapEnt on Wed 5th Nov 2014 19:39 UTC in reply to "RE: A cople of comments."
CapEnt
Member since:
2005-12-18

Meritocracy is meritocracy no matter if it was done by a individual, a loose group or a corporation.

If it happens to be RedHat that funds the development of software pieces that Debian though to be important enough to compel then to choose SystemD, the merit is all upon RedHat, their management and the quality of their developers.

Reply Parent Score: 4