Linked by jessesmith on Wed 5th Nov 2014 10:39 UTC
Linux Over the past year I've been reading a lot of opinions on the new init technology, systemd. Some people think systemd is wonderful, the bee's knees. Others claim that systemd is broken by design. Some see systemd as a unifying force, a way to unite the majority of the Linux distributions. Others see systemd as a growing blob that is slowly becoming an overly large portion of the operating system. One thing that has surprised me a little is just how much people care about systemd, whether their opinion of the technology is good or bad. People in favour faithfully (and sometimes falsely) make wonderful claims about what systemd is and what it can supposedly do. Opponents claim systemd will divide the Linux community and drive many technical users to other operating systems. There is a lot of hype and surprisingly few people presenting facts.
Permalink for comment 599245
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: Systemd impact
by woegjiub on Fri 7th Nov 2014 00:42 UTC in reply to "RE[3]: Systemd impact"
woegjiub
Member since:
2008-11-25

Setting aside the fact that networkd is not intended to replace NetworkManager, would that really be such a bad thing?

Pretty much all of the network management solutions out there suck hard, with the possible exception of Arch Linux's netctl.

If systemd can ship a network management tool that gets rid of NetworkManager, more power to them. The NetworkManager command-line interface is atrocious, and given that Tom Gundersen (Arch developer) has been behind most of networkd, we may see something as excellent as Arch's netctl come out of this.

Reply Parent Score: 3