Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 23rd Feb 2015 17:44 UTC

A U.S. federal judge has dismissed an antitrust lawsuit that charges Google harmed consumers by forcing Android handset makers to use its apps by default, but gave the plaintiffs three weeks to amend their complaint.

The two consumers who filed the suit failed to show that Google's allegedly illegal restrictive contracts on manufacturers of Android devices resulted in higher prices on phones, U.S. District Judge Beth Labson Freeman said in a Feb. 20 ruling.

Handset makers are free to release Android handsets without Google's applications, however, if you want one Google Android application, you got to have them all. I don't know if the latter is harmful in any way for consumers, but the plethora of insanely cheap - and sometimes, cheap and still really good - Android devices seems to contradict the complaint from the plaintiffs that it drives up prices.

Permalink for comment 605966
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Comment by Drumhellar
by Drumhellar on Wed 25th Feb 2015 18:32 UTC in reply to "RE: Comment by Drumhellar"
Member since:

That's an old article, and if IIRC, was thoroughly refuted on OSNews and in the Ars comments, in part by people that actually work on AOSP.

It's been more than a year since that article, and AOSP is still quite useful - Cyanogen is going strong, and Amazon's is doing fairly well (right?)

Reply Parent Score: 3