Linked by Adam S on Fri 5th Jun 2015 15:26 UTC
Android In June of last year, I finally decided to commit to an Android device. I had carried every flagship iPhone up through that point from the original iPhone to the 5S. To the world around me, I heaped the praise into a life transforming device, but in my tech circles, and on my blog, I frequently posted about my frustration, mostly with shackles and intentional limitations imposed. So last year, why I decided to make the jump to Android. I outlined 10 reasons why I was finally ready to make the jump to Android’s 4.4 release, KitKat. A year has passed. It's time to revisit my original assertions and complaints with some follow up and see where I stand one year later.
Permalink for comment 612074
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Conflating Identity and Security
by shadowhand on Fri 5th Jun 2015 16:12 UTC
Member since:

Apple has literally stored your security keys on your body

Good security implies that the keys are only in brain memory (or the combination to a safe that holds the keys). Biometrics are not security, they are identity. Security can be enhanced by biometrics, but biometrics alone is not security. It is far easier to copy a fingerprint than it is to copy a passphrase from my brain.

As an extreme case, if a VIP was captured and their phone was biometrically locked, how much easier would it be to access their phone if the only security was a fingerprint vs a strong passphrase?

Biometric identity to unlock the average user's phone is highly convenient but very insecure.

Reply Score: 9