Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 27th Aug 2015 23:18 UTC
Windows This hit the news yesterday.

Microsoft released Windows 10 four weeks ago today, and now the company is providing a fresh update on its upgrade figures. 14 million machines had been upgraded to Windows 10 within 24 hours of the operating system release last month, and that figure has now risen to more than 75 million in just four weeks.

As somebody who uses Windows every day, and who upgraded to Windows 10 a few weeks before it was released, let me make a statement about all the positive Windows 10 reviews that not everyone is going to like. There are only two reasons Windows 10 is getting positive reviews. First, because it's free. This one's a given. Second, and more importantly: Windows 10 is getting positive reviews because none of the reviewers have forced themselves to use nothing but Metro applications.

Here's the cold and harsh truth as I see it: despite all the promises, Metro applications are still complete and utter garbage. Let me explain why.

Permalink for comment 616803
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Win32 vs Metro
by dpJudas on Fri 28th Aug 2015 04:43 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: Win32 vs Metro"
dpJudas
Member since:
2009-12-10

And how much of this 'visually rich' stuff actually enhances the application in some tangible way, rather than just being eye candy?

Hehe, well personally I like candy. ;)

I generally don't disagree that we "lost something" usability-wise since Windows 95 where everything was built using common controls. I just think that appearance of an application matters more than most developers realize. It is kind of like it shouldn't matter if a game is ugly if it has good gameplay. In the end both things matter and you need a good balance.

Reply Parent Score: 3