Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 27th Aug 2015 23:18 UTC
Windows This hit the news yesterday.

Microsoft released Windows 10 four weeks ago today, and now the company is providing a fresh update on its upgrade figures. 14 million machines had been upgraded to Windows 10 within 24 hours of the operating system release last month, and that figure has now risen to more than 75 million in just four weeks.

As somebody who uses Windows every day, and who upgraded to Windows 10 a few weeks before it was released, let me make a statement about all the positive Windows 10 reviews that not everyone is going to like. There are only two reasons Windows 10 is getting positive reviews. First, because it's free. This one's a given. Second, and more importantly: Windows 10 is getting positive reviews because none of the reviewers have forced themselves to use nothing but Metro applications.

Here's the cold and harsh truth as I see it: despite all the promises, Metro applications are still complete and utter garbage. Let me explain why.

Permalink for comment 616853
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Win32 vs Metro
by chrish on Fri 28th Aug 2015 15:18 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: Win32 vs Metro"
Member since:

The hilarious part of supporting "visually rich" apps is that everyone's gone for this minimalistic flat style that reduces usability, while turning all the visuals into whiteness, squares and rectangles.

I gave the Metro apps in Win 10 a chance, I really did. I might even give the Metro version of Wunderlist another go when they update it for Win 10.

The apps I use every day are all "desktop" apps. The move to Metro always loses you a lot of functionality, even beyond the worse UI... compare the Metro OneNote in Win 10 to the desktop OneNote from Office 2013.

- chrish

Reply Parent Score: 4