Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 27th Aug 2015 23:18 UTC
Windows This hit the news yesterday.

Microsoft released Windows 10 four weeks ago today, and now the company is providing a fresh update on its upgrade figures. 14 million machines had been upgraded to Windows 10 within 24 hours of the operating system release last month, and that figure has now risen to more than 75 million in just four weeks.

As somebody who uses Windows every day, and who upgraded to Windows 10 a few weeks before it was released, let me make a statement about all the positive Windows 10 reviews that not everyone is going to like. There are only two reasons Windows 10 is getting positive reviews. First, because it's free. This one's a given. Second, and more importantly: Windows 10 is getting positive reviews because none of the reviewers have forced themselves to use nothing but Metro applications.

Here's the cold and harsh truth as I see it: despite all the promises, Metro applications are still complete and utter garbage. Let me explain why.

Permalink for comment 616873
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[5]: Win32 vs Metro
by dpJudas on Fri 28th Aug 2015 18:39 UTC in reply to "RE[4]: Win32 vs Metro"
dpJudas
Member since:
2009-12-10

Even if I agreed with this (which I don't as long as the app is user-friendly), I think we've swung too far in the 'just make it look pretty' direction to the point where a major update for most apps these days mainly consists of slapping a new coat of paint on it, while removing a feature or three in the process, all in the name of 'elegant' app design.

Allowing designs is no guarantee that the designer knows what he is doing. Still, when done right I find it very pleasing to look at, and if two programs/websites are roughly functionally identical I will pick the pretty one. More importantly, if I don't know which is best I will try the pretty app the first.

Reply Parent Score: 2