Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 19th Nov 2015 21:28 UTC
Apple

Much of the marketing around Apple's new iPad Pro has been centered on its ability to run professional grade software and the variety of creativity apps it supports. But for smaller developers of pro software, the iPad Pro may present more of a quandary than a new computing platform.

The reason? Despite the new tablet's processing power and capabilities, it's still running on mobile software - and developers aren't totally convinced the economic incentives exist in the App Store for iOS. In short, they feel they wouldn't be able to charge users the amounts they normally would for a version of their software that runs on a desktop.

It's a problem that exists not only around the iPad Pro, but mobile software development in general, and highlights the very real challenges that smaller software companies face when deciding which software platforms to prioritize - especially as mobile tablets and PCs converge.

This is a huge problem for closed, mobile-first devices like Apple's iPad Pro. Large companies like Adobe can run comprehensive cloud infrastructures and fund the burden of mobile development with the sales of proper software. Smaller developers, however, cannot. This problem doesn't exist on competitors like the Surface Pro, because they run a traditional, proper desktop.

After the starry eyes of the initial gold rush subsided, it became clear centralised application stores wreaked havoc in the software industry, and caused a spiraling race to the bottom. Sadly, it seems like Apple has no answer to this problem for its iPad Pro.

Permalink for comment 621079
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Ithamar
Member since:
2006-03-20


But customers have been pushed by Apple into thinking that software is worthless,


How did Apple do that? It is the developers setting the price, so the developers decided to lower the price. The only thing here is that Apple forced a single, globally visible market for software, and lots of people are willing to take a loss initially in the hopes that they will sell enough "copies".

Apple really has very little to do with it....

Reply Parent Score: 2