Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 2nd Aug 2016 21:28 UTC
Windows

The Windows 10 Anniversary Update was released earlier this evening, and I dutifully installed it so that I could write about any oddities that might pop up. Well, a number of oddities have popped up, and they're bad - really bad. The Anniversary Update does some really shady stuff during installation that it doesn't inform you of at all until after the fact.

First, the Anniversary Update reinstalls Skype "for you", even if you had it uninstalled earlier, which in and of itself is a blatant disregard for users - I uninstalled it for a reason, and I'd like Microsoft to respect that. That in and of itself is bad enough, but here's the kicker: during installation, Microsoft also automatically logs you into Skype, so that possible Skype contacts can just start calling or messaging you - again, without ever asking for the user's consent.

Imagine my surprise when I open that useless Metro notification center thing - whose button now sits in the bottom right of the task bar, right of the clock, even, and is unremovable - and see that Skype is now installed, and that I'm logged in. This is a blatant disregard for users, and I'm sure tons of users will be unpleasantly surprised to see Microsoft forcing Skype down their throats.

There was an even bigger surprise, though: during installation of the Anniversary Update, Microsoft apparently flags Classic Shell - a popular Start menu replacement that gives Windows 10 a customisable Start menu that doesn't suck - as incompatible with the Anniversary Update, and just straight-up deletes hides it from your computer - again, without ever notifying you beforehand or asking you for your permission.

Update: actually, the application isn't removed entirely - it's still there in the Program Files folder, but it's entirely scrapped from search results and the Start menu. Effectively, for most users, that's identical to removing it. What an incredibly odd and user-hostile way of dealing with this. You can see how the wording in the screenshot below is confusing regarding the removing vs. hiding issue.

Classic Shell released an update to fix the compatibility issue detected, so I hope my settings are still there somewhere, because it'd suck having to redo all of them because Microsoft just randomly deleted a program from my computer hid a program, without informing me or asking me for my permission. It could've just disabled the program, prevented it from running - why delete hide it entirely? Are they that desperate to try and get me to use their terrible excuse for a Start menu?

So, just in case you're about to install this update - Microsoft will force Skype down your throat, and may randomly delete hide programs from your computer without asking for your permission.

Have fun.

Permalink for comment 632665
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
A bit exaggerated
by MrHood on Wed 3rd Aug 2016 07:25 UTC
MrHood
Member since:
2014-12-02

The Anniversary Update does some really shady stuff during installation that it doesn't inform you of at all until after the fact. etc etc etc


Honestly, the only thing that I really find bad in your situation is Skype's auto-login (because it uses your credentials without asking you for confirmation). But I wouldn't be so dramatic about the rest...

- I if understood well, Skype gets upgraded (as many other apps do) along with the operating system (and part of it seems to be now embedded into Windows). To have it, say, lose all of your contact information without gracefully migrating it to the new app is a different matter.

- As many have noticed, the Classic Shell application (which I happily used too, in the Windows 8[.1] days) was hacked around the update release time, so this might explain the incompatibility. Not that you shouldn't expect incompatibility to old software in general, anyway - even if it's Windows, which always treated old software better than others.

To put it short, I wouldn't be too upset like you appear to be. I know you have rightfully pointed out less-than-desired Windows practices in the past, but at this point it may seem you are reasoning forward by inertia.

Reply Score: 2