Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 12th Sep 2016 17:20 UTC

The reasons some Mac lovers stick with OS 9 are practically as numerous as Apple operating systems themselves. There are some OS 9 subscribers who hold out for cost reasons. Computers are prohibitively expensive where they live, and these people would also need to spend thousands on new software licenses and updated hardware (on top of the cost of a new Mac). But many more speak of a genuine preference for OS 9. These users stick around purely because they can and because they think classic Mac OS offers a more pleasant experience than OS X. Creatives in particular speak about some of OS 9's biggest technical shortcomings in favorable terms. They aren't in love with the way one app crashing would bring down an entire system, but rather the design elements that can unfortunately lead to that scenario often better suit creative work.

If OS 9 had modern applications and - even moderately - modern hardware, I would be using it. No question. I have an iBook G3 fully working and running OS 9, including important software, within arm's grasp (I used to have an iMac G3 for the same purpose). It's difficult to explain, but the reason for me is Platinum, the user interface. OS 9's Finder, the graphical and behaviourial aspects of the user interface, the speed, the BeOS-like quirkiness - it all adds up to an operating system with a personality that is incredibly pleasant to use, regardless of the hodgepodge house-of-cards internals.

And personality is, unfortunately, what Windows, desktop Linux, macOS, iOS, and Android sorely, sorely lack.

Permalink for comment 634280
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Comment by p13.
by p13. on Tue 13th Sep 2016 10:09 UTC
Member since:

Heh ... articles like this are weird.

Trying to anthropomorphize software is strange imho.

I like the look and feel of classic macos (quite a bit), which is arguably the only part where "personality" comes into play.
The rest of classic macos is just a major PITA.
A major PITA for which we are still paying a price today ... HFS, resource forks anyone? What about funky codepages? hmmm ...

Remember how multiprocessing was handled? No memory protection either, voluntary multitasking, etc etc.

It wasn't very stable, but the look and feel was very good imho.

Reply Score: 3