Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 14th Sep 2016 21:29 UTC
Apple has obtained a long list of e-mails from primarily female Apple employees (but also a few male employees), detailing a sexist culture inside the company that nobody seems to want to address. The 50 pages of e-mails were handed to Mic by an Apple employee, and obviously, all people involved have been anonymised.

"With such love for a company that does so much good, it is with a heavy heart that I declare my resignation from Apple," a former employee wrote in an email obtained by Mic. "Despite all attempts to seek justice within this corporation, the cries of several minority employees about the toxic and oppressive environment have gone unanswered. I have witnessed the complete and utter disenfranchising of the voices of men and women of color and the fault lies not only in the direct management staff but in the response of those tasked with protecting employee rights. I write this letter hoping to highlight the areas that these departments have failed to properly support employees and as such have hence left Apple, Inc. culpable for various EEOC and ethical violations."

According to Claire*, "several people" who have quit, citing a "white, male, Christian, misogynist, sexist environment," were not given exit interviews. "Their departure is being written up as a positive attrition," she told Mic.

This obviously - but sadly - doesn't surprise me in the slightest. Silicon Valley is an inherently toxic environment dominated by white males, and despite all the talk from Tim Cook and various company bloggers, Apple is not the special diversity flowerchild farting rainbows and puking unicorn dust it claims to be. I mean, this is a company who considers having a Canadian speaking on stage during an event as "diversity".

From these emails, a picture emerges of a company culture actively trying to get women to leave, actively preventing them from getting into mid-level and top-level leadership positions. From everything I've ever heard about Silicon Valley culture - this is par for the course, no matter the company.

Permalink for comment 634541
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[16]: Comment by ddc_
by ddc_ on Sun 18th Sep 2016 01:53 UTC in reply to "RE[15]: Comment by ddc_"
Member since:

" never argued that the figures did not grow. I argued that the growth is too small to make the whole issue significant.

9% is not insignificant.
OK, one last attempt. The figures of the "hate crimes" are so small that an increase by 9%, by 14%, by 42%, or even by 900% won't actually indicate any sort of "toxic" climate. UK is just not a country with a "toxic" climate. Look elsewhere.

See, the level of humidity in my location changed over a couple of days by 60%. Does it mean that my location changed climate zone? No, because this figure, although statistically significant in its context and directly related to the definition of climate zone, does not necessarily mean that the climate zone change occured.

Now, if there was indeed "toxic" climate coming to the UK, the rate of "hate crimes" would increase over time. The 9% figure that you chose to poke in my face as an evidence that BREXIT vote outcome formed "toxic" environment in UK would not be a product of decrease by 29% percent since June, but rather an increase.

Reply Parent Score: 2