Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 9th Dec 2016 20:56 UTC
PDAs, Cellphones, Wireless

Basically: not having a headphone jack might not be enough to deter sales of a phone, but it's still really annoying and requires users to spend additional money to reclaim very basic functionality from their devices. And most of that money flows back to the device vendor, effectively increasing the price of the phone. We've taken something simple and universal, and turned it into something complex and proprietary, for no obvious benefits. It's a bad trade-off. It's... user-hostile and stupid. There's just no getting around it.

There's no tangible benefit to ditching the universal 3.5mm jack - whether Apple does it, or Samsung does it, or anyone else does it.

We're months and months into this discussion now, and to this day, nobody - not Apple, not Samsung, not John Gruber, not any commenters anywhere - has given me a real, valid, tangible reason why removing the 3.5mm jack is a good idea. Lightning audio is stupid because only the iPhone/iPad support it (not even Macs come with Lightning ports), and wireless audio is garbage - something even Apple is only now finding out. Those wireless AirPods Apple unveiled to much fanfare? They have been delayed and delayed, and are actually still unavailable, because Bluetooh audio is complete and utter garbage.

It almost feels like removing the 3.5mm jack was a sociological science experiment to determine just how far people were willing to go to defend and rationalise a deeply dumb idea.

Permalink for comment 638286
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Ah
by mathhammer on Mon 12th Dec 2016 14:12 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: Ah"
Member since:

I still use my SCSI 68 pin drives (Atlas 15k), As raw speed goes they can match anything with a platter.

Everyone seems to want to hate on SCSI, but every also seems to forget SCSI 50 pin connectors were matched up against MFM drives and the earliest IDE drives, and they were crap. SCSI had scatter gather, multiple commands, command queuing, and heavy cable shielding with a parallel communication structure. SCSI was better and even now the SAS (Serial Attached SCSI) is still better than SATA (to the end user now, though; there isn't enough difference to justify it) (SCSI on a multitasking OS back in the day was worth the money and then some)

Reply Parent Score: 2