Linked by Eugenia Loli on Wed 23rd Nov 2005 18:54 UTC
Permalink for comment 64219
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/19/13 23:02 UTC, submitted by M.Onty
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/19/13 22:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-06
4.)They are a great bunch of people with a good business model.
Well:
Imendio has invested approximately $25000 to date and are aiming to continue to support this open project.
This has been tried by many companies, including Eazel and Ximian in the past, and they simply haven't survived. They've got bogged down by their attachment to the software and religious arguments than they have by their attachment to staying in business.
Other factors that
have made GTK+ successful include:
* The licensing model (LGPL)
I never fail to be amazed by these companies that will blow money they haven't got on this stuff in order to allow others to develop everything for free. There must be some extremely well hidden revenue stream I'm not seeing here....... Creating a cross platform technology that works well on even one platform takes a lot of focused time and effort.
Of course sensible businesses out there buy a cross-platform toolkit that actually works today, save themselves up to $20,000+ (and more - that's an open-ended figure there) and actually write applications that are useful to people that they can sell and will keep them in business. But, you know.....