Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 28th Mar 2017 22:47 UTC
Legal

The United States, a country in North-America bogged down by extensive corruption, just passed a bill allowing ISPs to share and sell users' browsing history without their consent.

Internet providers now just need a signature from President Trump before they’re free to take, share, and even sell your web browsing history without your permission.

The House of Representatives passed a resolution today overturning an Obama-era FCC rule that required internet providers to get customers' permission before sharing their browsing history with other companies. The rules also required internet providers to protect that data from hackers and inform customers of any breaches.

The corrupt US senator who sponsored this clearly atrocious bill, Marsha Blackburn, from an area in the southern part of the country called Tennessee, received 693,000 US dollar in bribes from AT&T, Comcast, Verizon, and other related companies who operate in the country's dysfunctional telecommunications sector.

In the United States, officially a representative democracy, it is entirely normal for high-level figures - up to and including the president of the troubled nation, a man named Donald Trump - to receive vast sums of money to enact laws written by corporations, regardless of their effects on civil liberties or the poor and needy people of the country.

Americans, as citizens of the nation are called, often lack access to basic necessities such as healthcare, parental leave, clean drinking water, high-quality infrastructure, and so on. This is in spite of the country's vast natural resources and wealth, to which only a few percent of the country's population of 320 million have access to.

Permalink for comment 642576
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: IMHO 2
by StephenBeDoper on Thu 30th Mar 2017 22:18 UTC in reply to "IMHO 2"
StephenBeDoper
Member since:
2005-07-06

How many medical innovations are developed in America? Short answer, a lot. In Canada? Almost none.


You are aware that Canada's population is about 1/10th that of the US... right? As for the "Almost none" claim, would I be correct in assuming that you didn't actually check into that? Or perhaps you just don't count things like, say, the discovery of insulin (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frederick_Banting#Isolation_of_insulin) or the development of one of the primary modern cancer treatments (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cobalt_therapy) as "medical innovations"?

That said, I'm not really sure what the point/significance is. I obviously can't speak for all Canadians, but I'll personally take access to those "medical innovations" via proper universal healthcare (without any split-the-baby compromises to appease the insurance industry) over bragging-rights on where they were developed.

We also do not have panels of doctors, such as in Canada and perhaps Europe that decide when we are too expensive to take care of anymore.


As opposed to the US, where insurance companies make that decision?

Reply Parent Score: 3