Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 9th May 2017 18:13 UTC

The arguments are well-worn, and we've been hearing them ever since Apple opened the App Store for the iPhone. Windows 10 S blocks the execution of any program that wasn't downloaded from the Windows Store. Arbitrary downloaded apps, or even apps with physical install media, are forbidden, a move that on the one hand prevents running malware but on the other blocks the use of most Windows software. Windows Store apps include both tightly sandboxed apps, built using the Universal Windows Platform, and lightly restricted Win32 apps that have been packaged for the Store using the Desktop App converter, formerly known as Project Centennial.

This positions Microsoft as a gatekeeper - although its criteria for entry within the store is for the most part not stringent, it does reserve the right to remove software that it deems undesirable - and means that the vast majority of extant Windows software can't be used. This means that PC mainstays, from Adobe Photoshop to Valve's Steam, can't be used on Windows 10 S. It also means that Windows 10 S systems can't be used to develop new Windows software. Should you want to run this kind of software, you'll need to upgrade to the full Windows 10 Pro for $50.

Aside from the obvious and entirely valid moral arguments against locked-down computers, there's also a huge psychological one specific to Windows 10 S: it's taking something away that we used to have. Comparisons to iOS or Android are, therefore, off.

I'm not a fan of locked-down, application store-only devices, because the companies patrolling these stores don't just do it for security and quality reasons, but also for anti-competitive and puritan reasons. They will block perceived competitive threats, and since they're American companies, they will throw gigantic fits over nudity while allowing gratuitous violence like it's no big deal. These application and digital content stores export (to us) outdated American ideas about sex and nudity and impose them upon their users.

I know why Microsoft is hiding the switch behind a $50 upgrade to Windows 10 Pro - to discourage people from actually upgrading, therefore trapping more people into the Windows Store - but like with Android, this switch should be standard and free to flick back and forth at will.

Permalink for comment 643938
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Psychology indeed
by sj87 on Tue 9th May 2017 19:41 UTC
Member since:

Microsoft has long had the problem of finding a way to force its customers and developers to its shitty shop. Now Microsoft has found it without making itself seem completely evil – except to us few who get the gist.

If even a fairly little portion of users retain the S on their computers, it will create lots of potential market share only available in Microsoft Store. That will attract developers one-by-one in fear of losing out.

Also, this offers Microsoft a way to force users to its own ecosystem, Bing etc. I am pretty sure they will successfully fool the EU bureaucrats until it's too late for them to do anything. That is, because once you change the customers, they won't care to go back even if given the same options.

Most importantly Microsoft was said to be targeting the young population, students et al with this move, because that's the key demographic where MS has been lacking so far. Also the most important one regarding our future.

Edited 2017-05-09 19:42 UTC

Reply Score: 5