Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 15th May 2017 16:18 UTC
Windows

Friday saw the largest global ransomware attack in internet history, and the world did not handle it well. We're only beginning to calculate the damage inflicted by the WannaCry program - in both dollars and lives lost from hospital downtime - but at the same time, we're also calculating blame.

There's a long list of parties responsible, including the criminals, the NSA, and the victims themselves - but the most controversial has been Microsoft itself. The attack exploited a Windows networking protocol to spread within networks, and while Microsoft released a patch nearly two months ago, it’s become painfully clear that patch didn’t reach all users. Microsoft was following the best practices for security and still left hundreds of thousands of computers vulnerable, with dire consequences. Was it good enough?

If you're still running Windows XP today and you do not pay for Microsoft's extended support, the blame for this whole thing rests solely on your shoulders - whether that be an individual still running a Windows XP production machine at home, the IT manager of a company cutting costs, or the Conservative British government purposefully underfunding the NHS with the end goal of having it collapse in on itself because they think the American healthcare model is something to aspire to.

You can pay Microsoft for support, upgrade to a secure version of Windows, or switch to a supported Linux distribution. If any one of those mean you have to fix, upgrade, or rewrite your internal software - well, deal with it, that's an investment you have to make that is part of running your business in a responsible, long-term manner. Let this attack be a lesson.

Nobody bats an eye at the idea of taking maintenance costs into account when you plan on buying a car. Tyres, oil, cleaning, scheduled check-ups, malfunctions - they're all accepted yearly expenses we all take into consideration when we visit the car dealer for either a new or a used car.

Computers are no different - they're not perfect magic boxes that never need any maintenance. Like cars, they must be cared for, maintained, upgraded, and fixed. Sometimes, such expenses are low - an oil change, new windscreen wiper rubbers. Sometimes, they are pretty expensive, such as a full tyre change and wheel alignment. And yes, after a number of years, it will be time to replace that car with a different one because the yearly maintenance costs are too high.

Computers are no different.

So no, Microsoft is not to blame for this attack. They patched this security issue two months ago, and had you been running Windows 7 (later versions were not affected) with automatic updates (as you damn well should) you would've been completely safe. Everyone else still on Windows XP without paying for extended support, or even worse, people who turn automatic updates off who was affected by this attack?

I shed no tears for you. It's your own fault.

Permalink for comment 644302
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Not surprised about the NHS
by Dave_K on Tue 16th May 2017 10:22 UTC
Dave_K
Member since:
2005-11-16

I'm not exactly surprised that the NHS are running out of date software like Windows XP in 2017. When I visited an NHS hospital lab in the mid 90s I was a bit shocked at the out of date and kludged together state of equipment that could literally be a matter of life and death.

There was gear in the haematology lab that still relied on CP/M software dating back to the 70s. The original hardware had been replaced with a BBC Micro + Z80 second CPU at some point to keep it functioning - I think the lab equipment connected to the BBC's analogue port, and of course used 5.25" disks to store its data.

The guy who'd re-written the code (burned to an EPROM inside the BBC) and cobbled together the hardware interface for it was long gone by that point. At least they wouldn't have to worry about malware I suppose...

As other people have pointed out, it's not as simple as them forgetting to install updates, or even lacking the budget to upgrade. The bespoke hardware and software in use makes things very different from a typical home or office, and there's also a definite reluctance to try fixing things before they're (completely) broken.

Just throwing money at it wouldn't necessarily solve all problems - under the last government the NHS blew around £12 billion failing to implement a new IT system after all.

Reply Score: 4