Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 21st Jun 2017 12:07 UTC
Ubuntu, Kubuntu, Xubuntu

Now that Ubuntu phones and tablets are gone, I would like to offer my thoughts on why I personally think the project failed and what one may learn from it.

To recapitulate my involvement in the project: I had been using Ubuntu Touch on a Nexus 7 on an on-and-off-basis between its announcement in 2013 and December 2014, started working on Click apps in December 2014, started writing the 15-part “Hacking Ubuntu Touch” blog post series about system internals in January 2015, became an Ubuntu Phone Insider, got a Meizu MX4 from Canonical, organized and sponsored the UbuContest app development contest, worked on bug reports and apps until about April 2016, and then sold off/converted all my remaining devices in mid-2016. So I think I can offer some thoughts about the project, its challenges and where we could have done better.

Excellent and detailed explanation of why Ubuntu Phone failed.

Permalink for comment 645939
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Device restrictions
by mistersoft on Sun 25th Jun 2017 11:45 UTC in reply to "Device restrictions"
mistersoft
Member since:
2011-01-05

So.. I know it's very difficult for a government to mandate any particular (non-essential) functional requirements

But.. perhaps some "encouraging" of more "open" phones and mobile computing devices could be done via progressive taxation.

E.g. with VAT/Sales Tax

Could have 3 levels:

Closed/Locked @ 30% VAT
Open 1 @ 20% VAT
Open 2 @ 10% VAT


Where Open 1 is a fixed but "open" bootloader with options for pointing to (signed-kernel) secondary/tertiary OS partitions/boot device listings.

Open 2 is fully replaceable loader with instructions. And the supplied one is Open source bootloader and phone baseband is non-network locked. Or similar

Reply Parent Score: 2