Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 17th Jul 2005 18:09 UTC
Permalink for comment 6473
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-08
Absolutely
I also add that a faster boot OS indicates an OS much closer to version 1. That could also mean no features yet or no bloat.
I see W2K boots on a pair of different xp2400s takes what seems several minutes (web pc) vs maybe 1m for disconnected. The slow machine uses a crappy old 4G drive which probaly slows things down a bit.
I still hope one day OS writers will get to a 1 sec boot from the HD spin up time.