Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 14th Sep 2017 22:11 UTC

Today, we are thrilled to unveil the next step in our journey for Windows Server graphical management experiences. In less than two weeks at Microsoft Ignite, we will launch the Technical Preview release of Project "Honolulu", a flexible, locally-deployed, browser-based management platform and tools.

Project "Honolulu" is the culmination of significant customer feedback, which has directly shaped product direction and investments. With support for both hybrid and traditional disconnected server environments, Project "Honolulu" provides a quick and easy solution for common IT admin tasks with a lightweight deployment.

I've never managed any servers, so it's difficult for me to gauge how useful of popular tools like these are. What is the usual way people manage their servers?

Permalink for comment 648906
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Great question
by Alfman on Fri 15th Sep 2017 07:56 UTC in reply to "RE: Great question"
Member since:


Domain controllers, like all the other servers, need to be left alone to do their role. If you're using some server for admin work that is not dedicated for admin work, you're doing it wrong.

Sure, if you have significant load. But not all enterprises warrant dedicated servers for each function. It increases operational and licensing costs for not much benefit. This was the case at one of the places I worked at with about 20 desktop computers.

Sure if you have load issues, then dividing the high usage processes makes sense, but otherwise I'd recommend just keeping it simple ;)

I haven't done windows admin in a long time, my clients on the linux side tend to have one large VPS running several daemons (DNS, SMTP, HTTP, SSH, etc) rather than several smaller VPSs, which at their scales would incur higher costs and overhead than running everything on one instance.

Reply Parent Score: 3