Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 26th Nov 2005 17:02 UTC, submitted by Megatux
Permalink for comment 65051
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 14:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
---
I agree with you. It sounds to me more like a joke than a serious "RFC".
From the article:
This language is called Eiffel and exists for over a decade
Well, acording to the link to Wikipedia, it is two decades.
Eiffel takes the principle of Object-Oriented programming to its extremes and, as a consequence, is a very easy to learn language.
OOP != "easy to learn" IMHO
It seems that all requirements for the language of choice are fullfilled by C/C++ so, why change?