Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 7th Nov 2017 11:50 UTC
OSNews, Generic OSes

Andrew S. Tanenbaum, creator of MINIX, has published an open letter to Intel regarding Intel's use of MINIX in the IME:

The only thing that would have been nice is that after the project had been finished and the chip deployed, that someone from Intel would have told me, just as a courtesy, that MINIX 3 was now probably the most widely used operating system in the world on x86 computers. That certainly wasn't required in any way, but I think it would have been polite to give me a heads up, that's all.

If nothing else, this bit of news reaffirms my view that the Berkeley license provides the maximum amount of freedom to potential users. If they want to publicize what they have done, fine. By all means, do so. If there are good reasons not to release the modified code, that's fine with me, too.

I can still barely believe this whole story.

Permalink for comment 650632
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: freedom
by The123king on Tue 7th Nov 2017 13:53 UTC in reply to "freedom"
Member since:

And? One of the biggest problems with the GPL is that it requires source code changes to be published. And it tends to "infect" projects that rely on other projects licensed under the GPL. This is one of the reasons Linux lacks decent proprietary device drivers (as drivers are goods at exposing hardware designs, allowing competitiors to steal your trade secrets).

I believe if you want true software freedom, the MIT/BSD licenses are the way to go. Freedom implies no restrictions. Therefore IMHO the GPL is not a free software license

Reply Parent Score: 1