Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 7th Nov 2017 11:50 UTC
OSNews, Generic OSes

Andrew S. Tanenbaum, creator of MINIX, has published an open letter to Intel regarding Intel's use of MINIX in the IME:

The only thing that would have been nice is that after the project had been finished and the chip deployed, that someone from Intel would have told me, just as a courtesy, that MINIX 3 was now probably the most widely used operating system in the world on x86 computers. That certainly wasn't required in any way, but I think it would have been polite to give me a heads up, that's all.

If nothing else, this bit of news reaffirms my view that the Berkeley license provides the maximum amount of freedom to potential users. If they want to publicize what they have done, fine. By all means, do so. If there are good reasons not to release the modified code, that's fine with me, too.

I can still barely believe this whole story.

Permalink for comment 650643
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: freedom
by Kochise on Tue 7th Nov 2017 15:52 UTC in reply to "RE: freedom"
Member since:

OK for MIT/BSD, but BERKLEY (like chosen by Minix) is good too. I personally favor the ZLIB. And it's normal people investing money into a technology wants to keep a little lead.

GPL are only defending their conception of freedom to benefit from proprietary work. Where are the GPL cpus, the GPL gpus, the GPL gsms and so on ? Software is one thing, hardware is another.

Reply Parent Score: 1