Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 7th Nov 2017 11:50 UTC
OSNews, Generic OSes

Andrew S. Tanenbaum, creator of MINIX, has published an open letter to Intel regarding Intel's use of MINIX in the IME:

The only thing that would have been nice is that after the project had been finished and the chip deployed, that someone from Intel would have told me, just as a courtesy, that MINIX 3 was now probably the most widely used operating system in the world on x86 computers. That certainly wasn't required in any way, but I think it would have been polite to give me a heads up, that's all.

If nothing else, this bit of news reaffirms my view that the Berkeley license provides the maximum amount of freedom to potential users. If they want to publicize what they have done, fine. By all means, do so. If there are good reasons not to release the modified code, that's fine with me, too.

I can still barely believe this whole story.

Permalink for comment 650695
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: freedom
by przemo_li on Wed 8th Nov 2017 12:58 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: freedom"
przemo_li
Member since:
2010-06-01

Not even that.

GPL requires that You make source code available with possible payment covering costs of making them available to USER of your software.

So GPL internal tools can stay inhouse.

And why AGPL was introduced for websites.

Reply Parent Score: 3