Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 26th Nov 2005 17:02 UTC, submitted by Megatux
Permalink for comment 65256
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 20:46 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 17:32 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-06-29
Am I correct in interpreting that this is supposed to replace C use in the majority of Gnome?
I don't think that's a good idea, C and C++ still have a lot of support and most of the people contributing code to Gnome most likely know C. C is a very common language, it is powerful enough and fast enough for an entire window manager and many of the applications that sit on top. Replacing C doesn't seem wise to me at all, especially since the language is still good and very well supported. C is very mature, and can be compiled for many platforms, as far as I know assembly is the only other programming language that can be compiled for more operating systems and architectures.
I think it would be a much better idea to have two officially supported languages for use with any desktop environment, one being either C or C++, and the other being somthing simple. Other programming languages can be used through contributed bindings.
Just my $0.02, no doubt not everyone will agree.