Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 17th Jan 2018 00:43 UTC
BeOS & Derivatives

In late 2002, Byte.com decided to combat falling ad revenue by charging admission to its archives of computing content. I have first-hand experience tring to harvest enough revenue from the Internet to pay operating costs, and fully support Byte's decision to move to a subscription model. However, my BeView columns on Byte.com are now virtually hidden from search engines and thus from the Internet, and hundreds of incoming links (which now redirect to a subscription page) might as well be broken.

The BeOS content I provided to Byte.com over the two years I wrote for them is tailored to a very specific niche audience. BeOS itself is, for practical intents and purposes, completely dead. Even though these articles were surprisingly well-trafficked at the time, it is hard for me to imagine that anyone would pay for access to the Byte archives just to read a few old nuggets.

Scot Hacker's BeOS columns for Byte, neatly archived. What an amazing treasure trove. I don't think this archive is new by any means, but it's the first time I've seen it.

Permalink for comment 652926
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: TuneTracker
by Earl C Pottinger on Wed 17th Jan 2018 19:13 UTC in reply to "TuneTracker"
Earl C Pottinger
Member since:
2008-07-12

I wonder how many script-kiddies tried to hack their local radio station only to find none of their software could touch it.

Yes, I know real crackers can break into even a Haiku system, but most of the ones who call themselves hackers are really just script-kiddies who don't understand what is really going under the hood.

I met one with hundreds of copied games claiming to be a hacker but asking information on how to handle a 2D array in machine language.

Reply Parent Score: 3