Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 6th Mar 2018 20:12 UTC

Microsoft is once again tackling privacy concerns around Windows 10 today. The software giant is releasing a new test build of Windows 10 to Windows Insiders today that includes changes to the privacy controls for the operating system. While most privacy settings have been confined to a single screen with multiple options, Microsoft is testing a variety of ways that will soon change.

There have been some concerns that Windows 10 has a built-in “keylogger,” because the operating system uses typing data to improve autocompletion, next word prediction, and spelling correction. Microsoft’s upcoming spring update for Windows 10 will introduce a separate screen to enable improved inking and typing recognition, and allow users to opt-out of sending inking and typing data to Microsoft.

I doubt any of these changes will reassure people who refuse to use Windows because of privacy concerns.

Permalink for comment 654350
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[5]: Comment by Drumhellar
by Alfman on Wed 7th Mar 2018 14:46 UTC in reply to "RE[4]: Comment by Drumhellar"
Member since:


The article is old. The NSA has found it easier to store their backdoors on CPUs. You may use an open source OS, but what about your CPU? They are actively finding a way and won't stop doing that.

We've covered the closed CPU firmware/microcode/management processors problem a couple times here on osnews and it is very concerning. However it's quite unlikely they'll stop infiltrating the operating systems too.

Unless we DIY everything, we can never be sure of anything. Open source don't mean anything if we don't have control over every stage of of our IT infra. Even if our PC fully is open source (both hardware and software), then what about our printers, routers, NAS, etc? See where this is going?

Some things are easier than others. There are lots of open source NAS and routers. I'm not so sure about printers.

Some people assume that high proprietary market share is evidence that open source is not important. However as I can personally attest to, there's a lot of equipment where despite my efforts, I've been unable to locate an open source vendor and have been forced to buy something proprietary against my wishes. This is a big reason why I'm always trying to promote open hardware/software whenever I can and am extremely wary of people claiming closed platforms don't hurt us.

Reply Parent Score: 1