Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 25th May 2018 20:23 UTC

This article is terrible, and clearly chooses sides with advertisers and data harvesters over users - not surprising, coming from Bloomberg.

For some of America's biggest newspapers and online services, it's easier to block half a billion people from accessing your product than comply with Europe's new General Data Protection Regulation.

The Los Angeles Times, the Chicago Tribune, and The New York Daily News are just some telling visitors that, "Unfortunately, our website is currently unavailable in most European countries."

With about 500 million people living in the European Union, that's a hard ban on one-and-a-half times the population of the U.S.

Blanket blocking EU internet connections - which will include any U.S. citizens visiting Europe - isn't limited to newspapers. Popular read-it-later service Instapaper says on its website that it's "temporarily unavailable for residents in Europe as we continue to make changes in light of the General Data Protection Regulation."

Whenever a site blocks EU users, you can safely assume they got caught with their hands in the user data cookie jar. Some of these sites have dozens and dozens of trackers from dozens of different advertisement companies, so the real issue here is even these sites themselves simply have no clue to whom they're shipping off your data - hence making it impossible to comply with the GDPR in the first place.

The GDPR is not only already forcing companies to give insight into the data they collect on you - it's also highlighting those that simply don't care about your privacy. It's amazing how well GDPR is working, and it's only been in effect for one day.

Permalink for comment 657483
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Member since:

"[q]The fines for not complying with the GDPR are based on a percentage of worldwide revenue... If you're an individual who writes a personal blog you are not making any revenue so there would be no fine... The legislation is aimed at businesses not individuals, i'm not sure it would even apply to an individual at all.

Not quite. The GDPR has a minimum fine in the millions of Euro. IIRC, it's 20 Million Euro or 4% of world-wide revenue (not profits, not net income). It'll easily bankrupt any small company or individual.

GDPR has no minimum fine, only a maximum. A maximum that is very very very unlikely to ever be applied. I doubt Equifax would have been hit with the max for instance. Fines will depend on each individual case. [/q]

I'll defer to for details; but as presented in the GDPR training I've done, they've viewed the Upper Penalty (maximum 20 Million Euro or 4% of world wide annual revenue) as the penalty - probably to scare everyone into compliance...but yeah.

Reply Parent Score: 0