Linked by Andrew Youll on Tue 19th Jul 2005 15:57 UTC
Permalink for comment 6671
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 20:46 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 17:32 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-14
It's an undeniable fact that software installation under WIndows is easier. In fact, that concept started with NeXT, not Windows, so be cool everybody!
any other arguments than emotional? i already mentioned the problem with upgrading packages. it has an O(n) time cost, compared to O(1) for a system with package management.
it is similar with installing the first time. compare:
* download firefoxe bundle
* drag&drop it somewhere
* download thunderbird bundle
* drag&drop it somewhere
* download gaim bundle
* drag&drop it somewhere
* download gvim bundle
* drag&drop it somewhere
* download gimp bundle
* drag&drop it somewhere
* download openoffice.org
...
to:
* start package manager
* select gimp, gvim, gaim, thunderbird, firefox, OO.o
* click install
yes. the second option requires a central repository and the user learning a different way to do things.
however, i would not equate "don't know something" to "something is more difficult".