Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 29th Nov 2005 21:42 UTC
Permalink for comment 67146
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-01
>So you're essentially saying that in even the newest
>versions of VLC for Mac OS X over 50% of the CPU is
>wasted (regardless of the video output method used)?
>Yeah, right.
No, I'm saying that MacOS X is very resource intensive in itself, leaving far less available power for things like Video playback. It could also be that the supporting chipset is a pile of poo. But the cpu itself packs more then enough grunt to do the work.
I've seen 600Mhz G3 based AmigaOne's (complete with a [in]famously crappy chipset) play DVD's back flawlessly. Clearly, something is very amiss with your laptop.