Linked by Eugenia Loli on Wed 7th Dec 2005 22:55 UTC, submitted by LogError
Permalink for comment 69854
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/19/13 23:02 UTC, submitted by M.Onty
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/19/13 22:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-13
I have no doubt that the problem of "never changing passwords" is a genuine concern, but I have difficulty believing that there are really that many applications with *hard coded* passwords. Can it really be the case that "It is virtually certain that there is not a single business critical application in your company that isn't wide open"?
It's also not clear to me how digital vaulting can eliminate the problem, without all of those badly written applications having to be re-implemeneted at the very least.
Sorry for being so very cynical! But the article would be more convincing if it hadn't been written by the European Director of Cyber-Ark ( http://www.net-security.org/article.php?id=844 ), who are the "networking company behind vaulting technology" ( http://www.cyber-ark.com/cyber-ark/index.asp ) .
Edited 2005-12-08 02:20