Linked by Andrew Youll on Wed 6th Jul 2005 21:54 UTC
Permalink for comment 714
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-06-29
Do you honestly believe you can brute force an encrypted file system? We're not talking about a bad 40-bit keyed algorithm here. My understanding is that these chips are just hardware implementations of common encryption routines like AES.
Let's say you have a disk that you stole, you don't have the password because it wasn't written on the guys laptop that you found/stole. So, you try guessing passwords: How long do you think it's gonna take you to get it assuming he didn't use "god," "love," or "sex?"
I think Windows XP already has encrypted filesystem though; they're just "slow" because the cpu has to do the work.
Well worth the speed costs if your work is sensitive.