Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 16th Dec 2005 14:57 UTC, submitted by mlauzon
Permalink for comment 74139
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-11-05
Linux is NOT a microkernel. Andy Tannenbaum (the guy who wrote minix and is a college professor) told Linus Torvalds he would fail his class.
How often Mr. Anonymous, do the network drivers crash the system in Linux? I've been using it in mission critical servers in the travel industry (where I'm a systems admin) with 0 problems in the past few years.
Tell me 1 *real* operating system that has a TCP/IP stack outside of the kernel? As much as Andy touts it, minix is still just a toy. GNU/Hurd is a microkernel and look what it is now, a big flop.
On technical merits, a microkernel is superior to a monolithic one. On implementation and performance, a microkernel is too slow with increased latency to be practical for many applications.