Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 17th Dec 2005 18:34 UTC
Permalink for comment 74756
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/20/13 6:17 UTC, submitted by MOS6510
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/19/13 23:02 UTC, submitted by M.Onty
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/19/13 22:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-09-21
You have to realize that Microsoft's job is a hell of a lot harder than Apple's. Apple has no problem breaking all manner of applications to implement new features. I'm fine with that, and it sure encourages rapid progress, but it pisses off regular consumers. If you've ever worked in tech support you'll know what a nightmare each OS X upgrade is in terms of compatibility.
Microsoft has gone the compatibility route, going to great lengths to make sure every broken old application still works. I think it has gotten to a point where the overhead has severely hampered their ability to get anything done. Eventually you just have to drop compatibility for old technology to move forward. I think we're seeing a start of that in Vista.