Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 18th Dec 2005 16:15 UTC, submitted by BCM
Permalink for comment 75121
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 20:46 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 17:32 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-12-18
I don't think it's all about "being a giving person" in the case of BG.
Take this a rather old sample:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2002/11/13/gates_gives_100m_to_fight/
So the adoption of linux is four times more dangerous for the world than HIV? It could be four times more dangerous... but for microsoft. There you have it. The "BG's a giving person" fairy tale.
And, please, let's not forget they are giving away money that was unfairly obtained in the very first place. That's the kind of crap we have being served today.
I agree it's important people do charity.... but naming BG Time's MOTY because of doing that kind of charity? I think it's way over the top.
Edmundo