Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 20th Dec 2005 13:03 UTC, submitted by zam001
Permalink for comment 76327
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-06
Go read the MIT license. MIT is more free than the GPL. It basically says you can do anything you want to the code -- print it on toliet paper or keep it secret. There is no viral requirement to share your source.
If you can legally get your hands on MIT licensed code you can redistribute it all you want without asking permission of the original author. The key part is that Novell has to agree to release the code in the first place, you can't force it out of them like the GPL lets you do.
Ubuntu aready distrbutes a lot of MIT licensed code since the whole current X server family is MIT licensed.