Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 3rd Jan 2006 10:28 UTC, submitted by sean batten
Permalink for comment 81175
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 20:46 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 17:32 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-13
I agree that a thin client seems the most likely scenario. If Google is to release a machine, why not a "network computer"? It might well run Linux, but probably the OS it uses won't be apparent from the user perspective at all.
The only problem is that this is the same thing Oracle tried in the nineties ( http://tinyurl.com/72lne ) with Sun also involved ( http://tinyurl.com/d72mn ) and it never took off. Is the world more ready for this now, I wonder?