Linked by Alcibiades on Wed 4th Jan 2006 18:04 UTC
Permalink for comment 81869
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-03
... about all this is that you have to spend a few hours tweaking stuff and the user will eventually break it all. Then you will have to do it again.
Windows is not ready for JoeUser's desktop
With all the CPU Cycles that those programs will consume, the user will need a quad-core cpu (one for each program)
Rant apart, I am shocked to see that windows does indeed need all this (I find it a little bit exaggerated).
An antivirus, Opera/FFox, MS Spyware and XP SP2 Firewall can cover most of the user stupidities. Outlook from Office XP is "ok" as well. Althought Thunderbird or OperaM2 may be better.
I don't like the comment that reads: "Keep all you information out of your pc"...
Well... I have a Macintosh and I Keep it ALL, Organized, classified and "secured". That's the purpose of a computer, isn't it?