Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 9th Jan 2006 11:28 UTC
When Apple introduced the latest incarnation of its iMac G5 product line, the reactions were almost exclusively those of praise. They had managed to make the iMac G5 even thinner, while at the same time upgrading its specifications. Apple also introduced Front Row, a remote control, and a built-in iSight camera. MacSupport was so kind as to provide OSNews with this new iMac G5; here are our findings.
Permalink for comment 83628
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
by Tobbe on Mon 9th Jan 2006 19:54 UTC
in reply to "RE[2]:Re"
Member since:
2005-07-06
As both a Mac- and PC-user I think there's more to the story here.
If you haven't actually owned a Mac, or used one for a longer period of time, I guess it's pretty hard to see why you'd want to pay big bucks for something that just looks good, compared to the powerful PC you'd get for the same price.
I think the answer lies both in the quality of the machine itself and in OS X. You can't run OS X on a regular PC today (legally). And when using OS X on a Mac it doesn't take long until you realize that OS X actually is designed to go with the Macs - the design of the interface actually extends beyond the display. The machine itself feels well-built and everything just works, just as OS X.
As a graphic designer / web developer I can just as well use the Adobe software-suite on my Windows machine, sure. I just really prefer to do it on my Mac. I'm really amazed over the fact that they've managed to create this extremely pleasant desktop environment that somehow manages to suit both computer newbies and power users.
Compared to OS X, XP really (and then I mean *really*) shows its age. The over-all feeling of quality you get with a Mac is hard to beat and I get the feeling that most anti-Apple complaining in these forums haven't actually tried the Apple products seriously.
Member since:
2005-07-06
As both a Mac- and PC-user I think there's more to the story here.
If you haven't actually owned a Mac, or used one for a longer period of time, I guess it's pretty hard to see why you'd want to pay big bucks for something that just looks good, compared to the powerful PC you'd get for the same price.
I think the answer lies both in the quality of the machine itself and in OS X. You can't run OS X on a regular PC today (legally). And when using OS X on a Mac it doesn't take long until you realize that OS X actually is designed to go with the Macs - the design of the interface actually extends beyond the display. The machine itself feels well-built and everything just works, just as OS X.
As a graphic designer / web developer I can just as well use the Adobe software-suite on my Windows machine, sure. I just really prefer to do it on my Mac. I'm really amazed over the fact that they've managed to create this extremely pleasant desktop environment that somehow manages to suit both computer newbies and power users.
Compared to OS X, XP really (and then I mean *really*) shows its age. The over-all feeling of quality you get with a Mac is hard to beat and I get the feeling that most anti-Apple complaining in these forums haven't actually tried the Apple products seriously.