Linked by Eugenia Loli on Tue 10th Jan 2006 04:18 UTC
Permalink for comment 84035
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 13:17 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 12:06 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-09
The tweening looks far worse than when it's made manually, it shows that it's morphed between shapes and not drawn. HOWEVER, this would be very useful for low budget productions such as tv shows, commersials etc. and I guess that was the target from the start. Not having to hire an asian studio to do the job and instead do it inhouse would be valuable. This will also be useful for single artists making short movies.
But for more expressionate and "artsy" productions I would pass on this one. I can't imagine a movie like "The Triplets of Belleville" being made with this technique, it would ruin the movie.
I for one prefer the older animations where you actually see the different pen strokes of each frame. It makes it looks much more alive and personal. Those movies costs a lot to make though.
This seems like a very valuable tool and I'd like to thank Robert B. Quattlebaum for opening it up instead of taking it with him in the grave.
I'm sad that his business didn't work, I've been there too. But it's better to leave before you go down with it.
Thanks again!