Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 17th Jan 2006 22:10 UTC, submitted by James Dickens
Permalink for comment 87137
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 20:46 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 17:32 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 11:39 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-01-17
SPARC has a purpose even on the desktop, it gives you a way to test and code programs for the servers, anything from a simple 1cpu 1U server to the large servers with over 140 cores, yes you can run the same code on them all so there is a reason for a SPARC desktop.
The complaint is about the naming, that causes confusion with the consumers. If a brand new, ultra 40 is an opteron most people would think that an ultra 45 is related, they should of kept to there current naming of calling SPARC workstations blade. as in the blade 2500.
And if you want to see another reason for having sparc hardware check out the new T1 chip in the T1000 and T2000 servers, 1 RU and 2RU packages, that use less watts, and are faster than intel and amd chips at specific server tasks.