Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 18th Jan 2006 18:14 UTC, submitted by Anonymous
Permalink for comment 87322
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-01-06
Microsoft came along and said "Hey you don't need to pay that guy who knows all that 100,000 a year, you can get your PC tech to do almost the same tasks and pay them to do two jobs, network admin and PC tech. Save yourself tons of money in admin costs while you pay us a ton of money."
MS certainly lowered the threshold required to administer its platforms; however, I've never read anywhere MS saying that it's appropriate not to use professional administration of business machines. Can you provide a link to prove your point?