Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 19th Jan 2006 18:41 UTC, submitted by jonobacon
GNU, GPL, Open Source "When I first got into open source many moons ago, the advocacy movement was a thriving and vocal part of the community. Most of the movers and shakers back in the day were advocating the use of free and open software at work, to their friends and to their local community via LUGs and other groups. Back then, advocacy was a key part of the community, not only in showing existing computer users this alternative software, but also advising disadvantaged people for whom free software could really open up the doors to skill, employment and potential. Recently it seems this community-driven advocacy effort has petered out somewhat, and there are far fewer people talking about, conducting, exploring, refining and pushing open aource advocacy."
Permalink for comment 87665
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Maybe more subtle?
by tomcat on Fri 20th Jan 2006 00:53 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: Maybe more subtle?"
tomcat
Member since:
2006-01-06

Yes, there is. Being at someone elses mercy for fixes and added features isn't so hot. Not being able to see the code that makes my software tick sucks. Not being able to share and help others is wrong.

None of these criticisms suggests that there's anything "wrong" with proprietary software. The overwhelming majority of people could care less about those issues. If you're trying to "grow" that criticism, you're incubating it among an insignificant portion of the OS market.

Reply Parent Score: 3