Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 21st Jan 2006 19:18 UTC
Permalink for comment 88562
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/25/13 0:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 23:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Howard Fosdick on 05/24/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 14:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-10-02
Ohh nooo... that's the crazy one
.. On a good old 17"CRT-monitor i stick to 4:3 resolutions.
1600*1200 is small. That's why I'm using a slightly higher nominal DPI. This means text gets large enough to be easy readable, while being made out of a lot more pixels, thereby looking even better (except when I'm really tired - then everything is a blur) :p
EDIT: Fixed a typo in fouth line. "I" became "I'm".
Edited 2006-01-23 14:12