Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 21st Jan 2006 19:18 UTC
Permalink for comment 88592
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-11-10
I hope to have an x64 version available sometime after 1.0-Release is out. However, there are still technical difficulties to overcome with it. It appears that despite the hype, it is next to impossible to run 32 bit binaries on an x64 system. Only the simplest "c" programs will run, anything that uses several dynamic libs do not seem to work. This may change in the future, but for now it means that the x64 version will have to use special x64 PBI's / binaries as well. I don't want to start supporting a seperate version like that, until the 32 bit version is all finished