Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 23rd Jan 2006 19:16 UTC
Permalink for comment 88992
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-01-04
MS can't win...
Do you suppose if they could go back and do it over again they wouldn't have gotten themselves into this predicament? Maybe made a more secure set of products or decided to compete fairly in the marketplace or not steal so much IP?
If they had done things fairly and legally the first time around they surely wouldn't have wound up in a situation where there are so many fanbois defending them because they would have established a reputation as a decent and honest company.
Or is their situation the fault of those who, admittedly illegally in many cases, exposed the weakness in design of their OS with 150,000 pieces of malware, viruses, trojans and worms [oh my]? Or the fault of those who beat them in court for their theft, decption and predatory monopolistic practices?
Pray tell, what could have saved them from this dilemma?