Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 28th Jan 2006 17:34 UTC
Permalink for comment 90571
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/20/13 6:17 UTC, submitted by MOS6510
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/19/13 23:02 UTC, submitted by M.Onty
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/19/13 22:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-01-09
To those criticizing the Unix security model when compared with Windows', all I have to say is that you do have a point when saying that the users files could be compromised but our point is that you can restrict the effects to that one user.
Consider that on most corporate scenarios (and even most domestic scenarios), a computer is shared by several employees (or family members) and therefore there will be multiple profiles on that particular system. Now imagine clueless user A downloading and running a malware from the Internet that ends up wiping all his files. Yep, that's sad but the good part was that clueless users B, C, D and E's files were saved. No system nor other users files were erased or otherwise compromised after that.
This is so much more than current Windows releases can claim. If Vista will change something on this regard, we're yet to see.